I am having a hard time sorting out this idea swimming around in the back of my mind. Why do we, as human beings, feel such anxiety about the free will of other human beings?
It is as if the way a particular group lives, thinks, or believes is some sort of affront to another group’s way of life just by their very existence. For example, I am talking about things such as homosexuality, religious beliefs, and family structure. If a person living in a relatively free society chooses a certain path and that path does not directly prevent another person from living how they see fit, what is the problem?
I see this dangerous thread of thought emerging (or reemerging) in which one group dictates to another how they should feel, think, and believe. Is it the fact that someone taking a different approach creates a great deal of anxiety over what exactly “the truth” is?
If you believe that you have the absolute unwavering truth, the fact that someone else might disagree might be very disconcerting. They do not want to even question their own thoughts because that might mean putting an unacceptable crack in their version of the absolute truth. So, they attack the seemingly opposing idea in a nearly persecutory fashion even though it really has no direct effect on their own personal faith and life . Is it better to destroy any possible decent than face one’s own doubts and demons?
Is that the difference between a faith-based system and an evidence-based system? In a faith-based system, the answers are already there. Anyone who disagrees, or ideas that emerge that contradict established knowledge, are obviously false and potentially very dangerous. In an evidence-based system, the truth is more amorphous. If an idea emerges that might challenge the status quo and it has merit, a previously deeply ingrained “truth” may actually change.
Is it the difference between rigidity and pliability? A sense of safety can be built behind high thick walls. But, when does it become a prison and no longer protection?
From the Tao Te Ching (trans. by Mitchel, 1988):
76
Men are born soft and supple;
dead, they are stiff and hard.
Plants are born tender and pliant;
dead, they are brittle and dray.
Thus whoever is stiff and inflexible
is a disciple of death.
Whoever is soft and yielding is a disciple of life.
The hard and the stiff will be broken.
The soft and supple will prevail.
Or to quote the Bible, Matthew 5:5:
Blessed are the meek, for they will inherit the earth.
I’m just having a hard time wrapping my head around these ideas. I’m not sure exactly what I am getting at here. Am I way off base? Do I make any sense? Can anyone help me out?